Neurifly vs n8n
n8n is workflow automation on a canvas, priced per execution and available self hosted. Neurifly is an agent platform for the European market: the same canvas, plus models, approvals, evidence and billing on one account.
n8n prices automation by workflow execution with unlimited users, offers an extensive catalogue of ready integrations and can be operated entirely on your own hardware. It is a strong tool for connecting systems, and for that purpose it is difficult to beat. An n8n alternative becomes relevant when a workflow stops being plumbing and starts making decisions on the company's behalf. That is where Neurifly is aimed. Model calls are on the same account and the same invoice as the run. A step that would do something irreversible waits for a named person to approve it. The run is hash chained into an append only trail with an evidence pack behind it. Code executes in a sandbox with its network cut by the runner itself. Metering counts the units actually consumed rather than a flat execution, and the whole platform runs in the European Union with per key spending limits.
| What you are comparing | Neurifly Apptivity | n8n n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Paid for what runs, not per seat | Confirmed A balance you top up, spent on tokens, searches, runs and storage. No seats and no minimum. | In part Per workflow execution with unlimited users: 20 euro a month for 2,500 executions, 50 for 10,000, 667 for 40,000. source |
| Runs in the European Union without changing plan | Confirmed European Union by default, on every plan. There is no region to switch on. | In part Self hosting is offered, so the instance runs wherever you put it. source |
| Models from more than one vendor on one account | Confirmed Models from several vendors, including open weight ones, picked per conversation and billed on one account. | In part Connect whichever provider you like and pay that provider separately. source |
| Every call recorded with its tokens, latency and cost | Confirmed An append only trail with the model, tokens, latency, cost and the key that made the call. Agent runs are hash chained. | In part Execution history is kept in the instance you run. source |
| A budget per key, refused before the spend | Confirmed A limit per key and per organization. The call is refused before it goes past the limit rather than invoiced after. | In part The plan caps how many executions a month are included. source |
| Runs on a schedule | Confirmed A schedule trigger, run by the platform's own scheduler rather than by a process that has to stay awake. | Confirmed A standard part of the product. source |
| Webhook and form triggers | Confirmed Webhooks, forms, a chat message, a task or a change in a collection can all start a run. | Confirmed A standard part of the product. source |
| A large catalogue of ready connectors | In part Tools are imported from an MCP server or an OpenAPI description and approved by a second person, rather than picked from a catalogue of thousands. | Confirmed A large catalogue of ready integrations. source |
| A person approves before anything irreversible | Confirmed A step that would do something irreversible waits in an approval centre, and the decision is part of the run's record. | Unconfirmed See the vendor's own pages. source |
| Each run is hash chained with an evidence pack | Confirmed The steps of a run are chained so a later edit is detectable, and the pack collects what the run read, wrote and spent. | Unconfirmed See the vendor's own pages. source |
| A code step that runs with no network of its own | Confirmed Code runs in the sandbox with its network cut by a filter the runner installs on itself, and the run is billed and recorded per second. | In part A code step runs in the instance you host. source |
Confirmed
In part
Unconfirmed
Last updated 4 August 2026
Start with a question, not a project.
Create an account, ask something real, and look at what the trail recorded. That is the whole evaluation.